| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Remove https://dust514.com/user/bugs/ if you CBA to read it - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A bug tracker is good. Reporting bugs that way is much better than using the forums for it. ...but it only works if you guys actually read the stuff posted there. Since you don't, it should be removed.
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.07.15 21:41:00
|
2. Remove the bug report system at https://dust514.com/user/bugs/ - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Remove the bug report system available at https://dust514.com/user/bugs/ since apparently nobody reads them. ...though I doubt anyone at CCP will read this either, oh well.
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.06.04 14:46:00
|
3. [Suggestion] On Tweaking Rifles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Adipem Nothi wrote: * Combat Rifle - Slightly increase burst interval Why not just add an over-heat mechanism to it, but one that cools down *really* fast so it only kicks in if you fire continuous bursts?
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.05.20 17:45:00
|
4. [Feedback] Scouts - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It really depends on how you change armour plates and/or the larger suits. Some kind of reduction to armour plate penalty or the ability to fit two light weapons might make sense, but it all depends on what other changes you go with. EDIT: Oh, ...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.05.20 17:32:00
|
5. Sticky:[Feedback] Armor Modules - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Either: - Give all suits a built in repair rate (even shield suits should have 1hp/sec, while other suits get more). This will allow you to lower the armour values of normal plates slightly since they don't have to be balanced around the *need* of...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.05.16 22:16:00
|
6. Sticky:[Feedback] The Little Things - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Guess you won't be reading bugs reports on dust514.com/user/bugs/ anymore, so I'll repost it here: 1. Sloth-effect (client-side, but really important :P): While a character is getting hit by a weapon, its movement speed slows down. Weapon-impa...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.05.16 20:54:00
|
7. Cloak for Scout only! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'd rather they lowered the fitting requirements for it and adjusted the scout bonus accordingly. Or, instead of having insane requirements for non-scouts, they could cut the duration by a factor of maybe 5, and give scouts a bonus that increases...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.04.03 16:13:00
|
8. Adjust the cloak visibility - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kn1qht wrote: What is this .. It depends on the skill and the type of cloak , the first one is hell'a visible , the second kinda visible , the third hard to see etc. Interesting, this is not something I'm aware of. Must have missed it, but I ...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.04.02 13:53:00
|
9. Adjust the cloak visibility - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
- The degree to which the cloak is visible seems to depend far too much on the present lighting conditions. While a cloaked player is often quite easy to spot (if you only look in their direction ;)) in some games the lighting makes them essentia...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.04.02 13:15:00
|
10. [request] More subforums/channels, similar to those of Eve Gameplay - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Please add some subforums/channels for specific topics similar to those found under Eve Gameplay. Currently, more or less everything ends up in General Discussion, and the thread spam there means it's impossible to actually discuss anything other ...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.28 15:20:00
|
11. Increase cloak visibility when taking damage - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The cloak should become slightly more visible when taking damage and should remain so a fraction of a second afterwards too -- to make up for the fact that it's harder to spot a cloaked player when firing your weapon (muzzle flash etc).
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.28 09:04:00
|
12. Lets look at scouts for a second objectively. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Assault mk.0 has 5 highs, not 4. Seems it also got to keep its 1hp/sec armour regen.
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.26 10:44:00
|
13. Headshot = Instant Death - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Marc Rime wrote: We have made-up space armour and energy shields. In fact, if we didn't, we'd die from the backscatter radiation produced by firing the made-up space weapons we use. Hell, there shouldn't even be a mult...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.08 17:02:00
|
14. Headshot = Instant Death - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
We have made-up space armour and energy shields. In fact, if we didn't, we'd die from the backscatter radiation produced by firing the made-up space weapons we use. Hell, there shouldn't even be a multiplier for headshots but I guess you can't mak...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.08 00:59:00
|
15. bring back BPO's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: Marc Rime wrote: Also, it makes no sense that militia would be fine, but standard level would break the economy... not to worry though, the "break the economy" argument has never made much sense anyway. Perhaps you ...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.08 00:41:00
|
16. bring back BPO's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: I never understood it either why BPOs were initially implemented. The fact that they admitted to not realizing the threat that BPOs pose to the secondary market if introduced en masse was a clear sign that CCP didn't think th...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.08 00:14:00
|
17. bring back BPO's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: No! BPO's are toxic to the future of the integrated play run market and should be at the very least drastically altered. I would even have no problem with my BPO' being refunded into AUR. They never should have been imple...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.08 00:06:00
|
18. bring back BPO's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
deepfried salad gilliam wrote: i have no problem with militia, but the std will break the economy for p2p trading, thats why they were removed from market That's funny, because the only reason they've given AFAIK was that they weren't current...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.03.07 23:36:00
|
19. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sam Tektzby wrote: Reason why thread is here is just one (actually aprox hundred in general discusion) and that reason is great wave of threads in general discussion. After aprox twenty pages we did not have any responce by devs. And thats re...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.02.20 01:09:00
|
20. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: There's a difference between balance changes and what's going on in 1.8. I direct you to my post on page 1: Awry Barux wrote: I skilled in to the Min Logi for the hack speed bonus. I spent a lot of time thinking about th...
- by Marc Rime - at 2014.02.19 22:09:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |